Linkin Park’s São Paulo Live Music Video Lands
Linkin Park has released an official music video for “What I’ve Done,” with the title identifying this edition as a live recording from São Paulo.
That distinction makes the embedded video the main event: this is not simply a page for the song title, but a specifically labeled live version tied to a city and presented through Linkin Park’s official YouTube channel. Fans looking for the band’s São Paulo performance can use the player here as the direct destination.
The supplied release keeps the essentials clear—“What I’ve Done,” Linkin Park, São Paulo, and an official-video designation—without adding extra claims around the performance. Press play for the complete official upload and let the live setting define the experience.
Jessie James Decker Sets Date to Remove Her Implants
Jessie James Decker is done leaving this one in the maybe pile. The singer has announced that she has officially scheduled a date to remove her breast implants, a decision she says has been under consideration for roughly six months.
According to Us Weekly, Decker shared the update on Instagram on August 21, describing the implants as “very large” and saying she had finally made up her mind. The post frames this as a personal choice she has been working toward, rather than a sudden announcement pulled from nowhere.
That timeline is the part worth noticing. Celebrity body decisions are often presented as instant transformations, neatly packaged for public consumption. Decker’s version is messier and more recognizable: a long period of thinking, repeated discussion, and then an actual appointment on the calendar. The date matters because it moves the story from intention to a concrete next step, even though the procedure itself has not happened yet.
There is also a difference between announcing a planned cosmetic procedure and documenting its result. Decker has confirmed the decision and the scheduling, but this update does not establish when the removal will take place or what the outcome will look like. BAD GOSS is filing this under celebrity self-editing in progress, not a finished before-and-after reveal.
For Decker, the appeal of sharing the decision appears to be control over the narrative. Rather than letting speculation build around a future change, she addressed it herself and acknowledged that she has been talking about it for months. That gives the announcement a candid, conversational quality—and guarantees that followers will be watching for the next update.
Sam Smith Says Their Non-Binary Identity Has Always Been Clear
Sam Smith is offering a pointed clarification about their non-binary identity: according to Just Jared, the singer says it has always been part of who they are. The revelation gives a more personal dimension to a label that is often treated by celebrity coverage as a headline moment instead of an ongoing truth.
The distinction matters. Smith, 34, is not being described as suddenly adopting a new identity in the report; the available account frames their comments as an explanation of something longstanding. That makes the story less about a dramatic announcement and more about Smith putting language around an experience they say has been there all along.
There is also a useful reminder here about the way public figures talk about identity. A celebrity may choose to explain a label publicly without owing the audience a complete timeline, a private backstory, or a perfectly packaged lesson. Smith’s reported comments, as presented by Just Jared, are concise but meaningful precisely because they push back on the idea that every public disclosure must come with a neatly edited origin story.
For Smith, whose public image has long been closely tied to highly personal songwriting and candid self-expression, the statement lands in familiar territory: direct, intimate, and designed to make the language feel less like a press-cycle accessory. That does not mean the report gives us every detail of what Smith has experienced. It does mean the singer is choosing to define the label on their own terms.
Bad Goss take: the interesting part is not treating this as celebrity spectacle. It is the quiet correction of a familiar media reflex—the assumption that a public identity begins only when a famous person explains it to us. Smith’s reported wording makes the timeline personal, not performative, and that is the detail worth keeping in focus.
The story currently rests on the report from Just Jared, whose available excerpt identifies Smith’s disclosure but does not provide the broader setting or full context of the remarks. Until more of the original comments are available, the cleanest read is that Smith has shared a longstanding perspective on being non-binary, without adding details that have not been reported.