BAD GOSS / 24•7THE GOSSIP IS BAD. THE TASTE IS IMPECCABLE.SEARCH ↗
BADGOSS⌕
CELEBSSEP 24, 2026

Anne Hathaway Says Verity’s Most Unhinged Sex Scene Was Non-Negotiable

The headboard stays. The biting stays. Dakota Johnson, Josh Hartnett and Anne Hathaway are bringing Colleen Hoover’s fever-dream thriller to the big screen exactly where it gets weird.

Somewhere in the Amazon MGM Studios production office, there is apparently a small graveyard of wooden headboard fragments. Anne Hathaway has seen it. Josh Hartnett has seen it. Dakota Johnson may have personally contributed to it. And if you have read Colleen Hoover’s Verity, you already know why.

In a joint interview with E! News, Hathaway revealed that the upcoming film adaptation kept one of the novel’s most bizarrely specific moments intact: the scene in which Lowen Ashleigh bites a headboard to muffle the sound of her orgasm. Not a toned-down version. Not a tasteful cutaway. The headboard bit is staying in the movie, because apparently there are some literary details Hollywood can change only at its own peril.

“There’re certain things, like, Verity can be a brunette, but we can’t mess up the headboard bit,” Hathaway said. “We have to get that right, because it’s too specific and unusual.”

That sentence is the entire Verity experience in miniature: glossy, lurid, slightly deranged and very confident that the strangest thing in the room deserves top billing.

The headboard has entered the chat

For anyone who missed the 2018 novel’s particular brand of domestic nightmare, Verity follows Lowen, a struggling writer hired to finish the bestselling series of Verity Crawford, a famous author left comatose after a car accident. Lowen moves into the Crawford family home, where she finds Verity’s unfinished autobiography and begins uncovering secrets that are considerably more alarming than the average writer’s block.

She also becomes romantically involved with Verity’s husband, Jeremy Crawford, which is where the headboard makes its unforgettable entrance. In the book, Jeremy performs oral sex on Lowen while she attempts to keep quiet by biting the wood. The detail is so oddly concrete that it has become one of the novel’s signature moments—not necessarily because it is romantic, but because it feels like the kind of thing you would tell a friend about with the urgent tone usually reserved for airport scandals.

Hartnett, who plays Jeremy, did not have to leave his own dental signature on the props. He did, however, see the evidence of his costars’ labor. “I remember going through the prop table at one point and seeing like a series of different pieces of the headboard with different bites on them,” he said, teasing Johnson and Hathaway that they “must have sat there for a while” biting each prop.

Hathaway’s response to the whole ordeal was wonderfully matter-of-fact: “I never thought I’d bite a headboard on camera in my life, but that was just a Tuesday.” It is hard to imagine a more Hathaway sentence—part glamorous movie-star anecdote, part exhausted office update.

Hollywood can change the hair. Not the chaos.

The funny thing about adaptations is that fans will forgive a lot until you alter the one detail they have mentally highlighted, underlined and discussed in a group chat. Hathaway knows that the film cannot reproduce every reader’s private image of the Crawford estate, the characters or the novel’s atmosphere. But some changes are more combustible than others.

“The house might not look exactly the way in your head when you read the book,” she said. “For a lot of people, Verity is a blonde. So, you just kind of hope that people will go with your version of it and let it be its own thing.”

That is the adaptation bargain: the blonde can become a brunette, the imagined house can acquire an entirely new staircase, and the sleepwalking sequence can be reduced to a fragment. But once you have promised the audience the headboard, you had better deliver the headboard.

Johnson explained that only a snippet of Lowen’s sleepwalking made the final cut, despite the production shooting more elaborate material, including moments in which Lowen ends up outside. Her reasoning was blunt and sensible: “It’s just not necessarily that interesting to watch someone sleepwalk.” A disturbing paragraph can thrive in a book. On screen, someone wandering around unconscious for several minutes risks becoming an expensive screensaver.

The headboard, by contrast, has built-in cinematic stakes. It is physical, absurd and instantly legible. It also tells you everything about the movie’s tone: this is a psychological romantic thriller, yes, but one that is not above letting a piece of furniture become a supporting character.

Anne, Dakota and Josh are a very glossy nightmare

The cast is doing some unusually elegant heavy lifting here. Hathaway plays Verity Crawford, the bestselling author whose body is unresponsive but whose influence hangs over the house like a perfume no one can identify. Johnson plays Lowen, the outsider pulled into the family’s secrets. Hartnett plays Jeremy, the husband at the center of the emotional and erotic triangle.

All three are also producers on the film, giving the adaptation a little more creative ownership than a standard star vehicle. Hathaway and director Michael Showalter previously worked together on The Idea of You, while Johnson’s production company TeaTime Pictures grew out of her interest in finding and developing material with the same immersive pull she looks for as a reader.

Johnson has described her reading habits as a willingness to “fall down the rabbit hole every time,” and Verity is very much a rabbit hole with expensive lighting. Its appeal is not simply the mystery of whether Verity’s writings are true. It is the sensation that every new discovery makes the house feel more intimate, more glamorous and less safe.

That combination may explain why the cast announcement generated such immediate enthusiasm from Hoover’s audience. When Johnson’s casting was revealed in December 2024, fans were, in E!’s memorable phrasing, “fifty shades of tickled pink.” Hoover later called her excitement about the cast “an understatement.” The author is also involved as a producer, alongside Hathaway, Johnson, Showalter and others.

The movie is keeping the spirit—and the splinters

Filming took place from January through March 2025, with Hathaway and Hartnett photographed working on scenes in Queens. Hathaway was later seen in a semi-sheer white dress, matching belt, sunglasses and leopard-print heels; Hartnett wore a navy suit in one sequence and a bow tie in another. Elsewhere, the pair were photographed smiling and running while Hathaway carried his jacket, which sounds less like a thriller setup than a very expensive argument at a wedding.

Hathaway said the first audience response brought relief to the team, particularly because they felt viewers understood what they were trying to preserve. “They thought that we got the spirit of the book correct,” she said.

That spirit, judging by the details the cast chose to discuss, is not solemn literary prestige. It is the deliciously unstable feeling that a beautiful house may contain a terrible secret, a manuscript may be a confession or a trap, and a sex scene may require multiple sacrificial props.

Verity is scheduled to arrive in theaters Oct. 2, 2026. Until then, the central question is not whether the film will recreate every image readers carried from the book. It is whether audiences will accept Hathaway as a brunette, survive the Crawford estate and recognize the exact moment when a headboard becomes plot.

One thing is clear: Hollywood may rearrange the furniture. It may streamline the sleepwalking. It may ask everyone to adjust their mental picture of Verity Crawford. But the woodwork has been warned.

DON'T GO ANYWHEREUP NEXT ↓
CELEBSSEP 24, 2026

Dolly Parton’s Family Feud Rumors Just Got a Wild New Chapter

Her sister Freida says the Parton/Owens family is not fighting over Dolly’s estate — even as a bitter security dispute has exploded into court filings, alleged threats and a very public family fracture.

Dolly Parton’s family is insisting there is no family feud, which is exactly the kind of sentence that tends to make everyone lean closer to the screen.

On Wednesday, Dolly’s younger sister Freida Parton addressed rumors that the Parton/Owens family had begun fighting over the country icon’s estate. Her message was brief, affectionate and very carefully worded: “There is no feud within our family. No one among the Parton/Owens family is fighting over Dolly’s estate.”

Then she added, “We all love Bryan, just as we love each other. I love you all!!”

The Bryan in question is Bryan Seaver, Dolly’s nephew and the former head of security for her properties. His abrupt removal from the role has turned an already emotional period into a full-blown celebrity-family saga, complete with corporate power struggles, angry statements, court documents and alleged messages so dramatic they sound like they were written for a prestige television finale.

The timing is what made everyone start talking

Seaver was fired last week by the executors overseeing Dolly’s estate, according to Us Weekly. His security company, SAPS, said Seaver and his team were given notice on September 16 that their services were no longer needed at Dolly’s Nashville home, museum and warehouse. A new security staff was brought in immediately.

That would already be a startling change after more than two decades of family-linked protection. But the timing made it feel especially jarring: Seaver had been chosen by Dolly to announce her death to the public just weeks earlier.

Seaver’s mother is Dolly’s sister Cassie Parton, and his family connection to Dolly was not merely ceremonial. His father, Larry, had reportedly held the security role before him. In the emotional video announcing Dolly’s death, Seaver spoke as someone carrying both a professional responsibility and a deeply personal loss.

“As her head of security for more than two decades,” he said in the video posted to Dolly’s official Instagram account, “I have imagined the heaviness of this moment but haven’t truly felt it until now.”

He described the moment as an honor mixed with “absolute pride and great sadness,” and spoke of Dolly being reunited with her late husband, Carl Dean, along with her parents and others who had died before her.

It is a particularly strange Hollywood aftershock: a trusted relative becomes the public voice of the family one minute, then is suddenly removed from the family’s properties the next. That whiplash is the engine behind the feud rumors Freida is now trying to shut down.

Then came the court filing

The dispute escalated when She’s Alive, LLC — the organization Dolly appointed to oversee her business interests after her death — asked a court to issue a restraining order against Seaver.

In the filing, Dolly’s manager Danny Nozell and fellow executors alleged that Seaver had threatened to use his “self-proclaimed military-contractor experience, access to weapons and capacity for violence” to pressure the estate into meeting his financial demands.

The filing described a series of alleged text messages in which Seaver identified himself as an international arms dealer and mercenary, promised retaliation and threatened to launch a podcast aimed at damaging Dolly’s brand partnerships. Other messages, as quoted in the court documents, included references to guns, swords, vengeance and “warfare.”

That is a lot of language to land in the middle of a family grieving one of the most beloved figures in country music history. It also explains why the phrase “family feud” suddenly started circulating, even though the underlying conflict appears to involve estate leadership, security work and a dispute between Seaver and the people now running Dolly’s business affairs.

A spokesperson for SAPS said the company was “dismayed by the unexpected and, so far, unexplained actions” taken by those in charge of the estate. The spokesperson also said the company remained committed to protecting Dolly’s family and accused others of acting in bad faith and trying to profit from her life.

That statement made the situation sound less like a quiet personnel change and more like a battle over who gets to define Dolly’s legacy — and who gets to stand guard over it.

Seaver says the messages were “rage-talk”

Seaver has denied directly threatening Nozell or anyone connected to She’s Alive, LLC. In a statement to TMZ, he described himself as a career soldier, military contractor and security professional, while insisting that the messages cited in the lawsuit were not threats.

He said he was speaking privately with Nozell, whom he considered a friend, and characterized their exchanges as “two guys having rage-talk and crying on the phone together while we were grieving.”

Seaver also said his most explosive comments were aimed at specific business partners he believed had mistreated or intimidated Dolly, rather than at the people currently managing her estate. He said he stood by those comments.

That explanation has only added another layer to the story. The alleged messages, the court filing and the public statements all point to serious anger, but the people involved are describing that anger in radically different ways: as intimidation, as private venting, as loyalty to Dolly and as a fight over who betrayed whom.

Meanwhile, Freida’s statement is trying to pull the family back from the cliff. Her post does not deny that the dispute exists. It denies that the family is fighting over Dolly’s money and insists that affection for Seaver remains intact.

That distinction matters. Families can love each other and still disagree spectacularly over business, security, access and control. In the celebrity world, where every private rupture gets dragged into public view, “there is no feud” can sometimes mean there is no permanent break — not that everyone is enjoying a peaceful group chat.

Dolly’s public image has always been built around warmth, loyalty and family. She made kinship part of her mythology long before the current generation turned family dynamics into content. Her siblings, nieces and nephews have appeared in the orbit of her career, while her businesses and philanthropic projects expanded into an empire that required layers of management.

Now, after her death, that carefully protected world is being reorganized in real time. The person who announced her passing has lost his security position. The estate’s executors are seeking court protection. A security company is accusing those executors of acting in bad faith. And Dolly’s sister is asking the public not to mistake a brutal internal dispute for a family war.

For fans, it is an uncomfortable sequel to a beloved star’s farewell: Dolly may be gone, but the battle over who protects her name, her properties and her legacy is only getting louder.

CELEBSSEP 24, 2026

Dolly Parton’s Family Drama Has Entered Its ‘Restraining Order’ Era

As Dolly’s manager seeks protection from her former head of security, her sister Freida Parton is asking everyone to stop treating the family like a country-music succession fight.

Dolly Parton’s family is apparently having a very Dolly-adjacent crisis: enormous, emotional, Nashville-based, and somehow involving a restraining order, business partners, estate concerns, and a message about loving everybody.

On Wednesday, Freida Parton, Dolly’s sister, tried to lower the temperature around the increasingly tense fallout involving Bryan Seaver, Dolly’s nephew and longtime head of security. “No one among the Parton/Owens family is fighting over Dolly’s estate,” Freida wrote in a social-media statement. “We all love Bryan, just as we all love each other.” She signed off with, “I love you all!!”

It is a sweet message. It is also the kind of message that arrives when the family group chat has clearly become an active crime scene.

The family says: please stop calling this a feud

Freida’s statement comes after a very public series of developments surrounding Seaver and Danny Nozell, Dolly’s longtime manager. According to TMZ, Nozell filed for a temporary restraining order against Seaver, alleging that Seaver had threatened him and tried to extort money from him. The requested order would bar Seaver from coming within 1,000 feet of Parton’s Nashville offices and from involving himself in her businesses.

Nozell’s filing describes a situation that sounds less like a quiet post-loss disagreement and more like a country-music executive thriller with rhinestones on the walls. He alleged that Seaver invoked his claimed military-contractor experience, access to weapons, and capacity for violence while seeking funds. The filing also included messages attributed to Seaver, including one in which he allegedly wrote, “All I do is warfare … everyone needs to be worried about what I might do.”

Seaver has pushed back on the characterization. He told TMZ that the messages were misconstrued and described them as private conversations between two people grieving and engaging in what he called “rage talk.” He also said he stands by many of the comments, while arguing that they were not threats.

That is not exactly the soothing clarification one sends when hoping a story will disappear. But it does offer a glimpse into how quickly private grief, old loyalties, and business power can become public spectacle.

The nephew at the center of the storm

Seaver’s connection to Dolly was not casual. He served as her head of security for more than two decades, following his father, Larry, in the role. He was also the person selected to announce her death in an emotional prerecorded video shared to Dolly’s Instagram on Aug. 25.

In that video, Seaver spoke about the weight of the moment and described it as an honor mixed with “absolute pride and great sadness.” He recalled Dolly telling him she wanted to rest in a beautiful bed of plush cotton because, after a life spent wearing heavy rhinestones, she deserved comfort.

It was an intimate, unusually personal farewell — the sort of message that made Seaver appear not merely like an employee, but like a trusted member of Dolly’s inner circle. Which is why the subsequent rupture has landed with such force. One minute, he was the family-adjacent figure delivering the goodbye. The next, his security companies had reportedly been fired, and his relationship with Dolly’s management team was being litigated through court documents and media statements.

Seaver told TMZ that he and his team were “dismayed by the unexpected, and so far unexplained actions.” He also expressed concern that changes to Dolly’s estate could be made in “bad faith,” adding that he and his team remained committed to protecting her family and final directive.

According to the report, Seaver’s firing did not remove his personal interest in Dolly’s trust, which covers properties and business interests. That distinction is doing a lot of heavy lifting here: the family may insist this is not an estate fight, but the public drama is unfolding around exactly the kind of money, access, and legacy questions that make people reach for popcorn.

Nashville’s Dolly empire becomes the backdrop

The conflict has also spilled beyond the family circle and into Dolly’s business world. Per the lawsuit documents obtained by Page Six, Seaver allegedly “menaced and intimidated” staff members at Dolly’s SongTeller Hotel and Dolly’s Life of Many Colors Museum in downtown Nashville.

The filing claims that some employees sought private security after allegedly fleeing the offices. It also alleges that personnel resigned, Dolly’s trusts-and-estates attorney withdrew, and staff members refused to return to the workplace because of the messages attributed to Seaver.

One alleged message threatened to “destroy the entire brand” if Dollywood business partners were not removed and referenced going to Billboard with damaging information. The filing characterized those alleged remarks as a threat to sabotage a core business relationship and use public exposure as a weapon.

Meanwhile, security was reportedly replaced at Dolly’s Nashville residence, downtown home, warehouse, and museum. That is a lot of locations, a lot of gates, and a lot of people suddenly having to decide whether a family disagreement is still a family disagreement once the security detail changes and lawyers start filing paperwork.

For a star whose public image has always been built on warmth, loyalty, and a seemingly bottomless supply of good sense, the optics are jarring. Dolly’s brand is not just music. It is hospitality, philanthropy, family storytelling, and the carefully maintained feeling that everybody in her orbit is being looked after. A dispute over access to that orbit is therefore bound to feel bigger than a normal workplace breakup.

Freida’s peace offering meets the internet’s favorite genre

Freida’s intervention is an attempt to pull the story back from “Dolly’s dynasty in crisis” and toward “this family still loves one another.” She specifically defended Bryan, insisting that “we all love Bryan” and that nobody in the Parton/Owens family is fighting over Dolly’s estate.

But the timing is what makes the statement so combustible. It arrived after Seaver’s removal, after Nozell’s filing, after allegations about threatening messages, and after concerns were raised about staff and business partners. In other words, it landed not as a casual family update, but as a velvet curtain being pulled across a very loud backstage argument.

Neither Seaver nor Nozell has publicly transformed this into a conventional celebrity feud, complete with talk-show interviews and strategically vague Instagram captions. The drama is more unnerving than that. It is happening through court filings, management statements, security changes, and the aftermath of a death that has left a famous family and a sprawling business empire trying to determine who gets to stand closest to the center.

Freida may be right that there is no family feud. But in the current celebrity-news ecosystem, the phrase “there is no feud” has the unfortunate energy of a fire marshal arriving with a clipboard while smoke is visibly coming out of the windows.

For now, Dolly’s legacy is being negotiated in the most modern possible way: through legal documents, carefully worded statements, alleged text messages, and a relative asking the public to remember that love can coexist with an absolutely spectacular mess.