BAD GOSS / 24•7THE GOSSIP IS BAD. THE TASTE IS IMPECCABLE.SEARCH ↗
BADGOSS⌕
CELEBSOCT 19, 2026

Kevin Pollak Says Rip Torn Was Hollywood’s Unbeatable Chaos Champion

On The Rich Eisen Show, Pollak remembered a Canadian Bacon set where paranoia, Nixon’s enemies list and one truly unhinged hotel-room shout became part of the daily weather.

There are eccentric actors, there are difficult actors, and then there is Rip Torn: a man who apparently treated every film set like a low-budget political thriller in which the enemy was always nearby and possibly staying in the next hotel room.

Kevin Pollak did not hesitate when The Rich Eisen Show asked him to name the “craziest” actor he had ever worked with. “Oh, jeez. It’s not even a competition,” Pollak said, selecting Torn with the speed of someone who had been waiting years for the question.

The story he told is less a Hollywood anecdote than a complete little ecosystem of beautiful disorder. It involves a John Candy movie, a Four Seasons in Toronto, a suspiciously thin wall, Richard Nixon’s enemies list and a line about milking someone “like a cow” that would make even the most seasoned gossip columnist pause mid-coffee.

Every day came with a new suspect

Pollak worked with Torn on Canadian Bacon, the satirical film starring Candy that was released after Candy’s death. According to Pollak, Torn kept his castmates guessing by deciding, on a rotating basis, that someone around him was out to get him.

“Every day Rip would decide someone in the cast or crew was out to get him,” Pollak recalled. It sounds like a premise for a prestige comedy about actors trapped in a snowbound production, except Pollak presented it as the ordinary rhythm of the shoot: call time, costume, camera, determine the day’s imagined adversary.

There was also, apparently, a recurring historical footnote. Pollak said Torn repeatedly mentioned that he had been included on former President Richard Nixon’s enemies list.

“If a day also went by without Rip Torn saying, ‘I was on Nixon’s list.’ All right, we got it,” Pollak joked.

When Eisen asked what Torn had done to earn that distinction, Pollak’s answer was the verbal equivalent of a shrug from a man who knew better than to open that door.

“Well, no one wanted to ask, quite frankly,” he said.

The hotel room next door had its own programming

The Nixon material, however, was only the appetizer. Pollak then turned to a story involving fellow actor Kevin O’Connor, O’Connor’s new bride and the room next door to Torn’s at Toronto’s Four Seasons.

For weeks, the newlyweds reportedly heard Torn shouting through the hotel’s thin walls. Rather than simply endure the nightly performance, they began cataloging it, compiling their own top 10 list of the most memorable lines.

The number one entry, according to Pollak, was Torn yelling at a sex worker: “I said milk it like a cow.”

It is a sentence so aggressively strange that it arrives with its own sound effects. It also explains why Pollak’s answer landed differently from the usual celebrity stories about a co-star being late, demanding or fond of an impractical trailer. This was not “he liked to keep everyone on their toes.” This was a man allegedly turning a luxury hotel room into an off-Broadway production with no posted closing time.

Pollak’s anecdote is a recollection of behavior he says he heard about from colleagues and is not a newly documented incident. Neither Torn, who died in 2019, nor the people involved can respond to the story now. But the tale fits the larger public image of an actor whose intensity could make even a supporting role feel like an event.

Rip Torn was built for memorable entrances

Torn’s career was much bigger than his reputation for unpredictability. He earned an Academy Award nomination for Cross Creek, worked across film, television and theater, and became instantly recognizable to different generations through projects including Men in Black and The Larry Sanders Show.

As producer Artie on The Larry Sanders Show, Torn played the exhausted, razor-sharp backstage operator who seemed capable of managing a network crisis, insulting a talk-show host and locating a bottle of something strong before the commercial break. The role earned him six consecutive Emmy nominations and a win in 1996.

That performance made his particular brand of mayhem feel almost inevitable. Torn could project authority and volatility at the same time, the rare actor who appeared capable of knowing exactly what was happening while also possibly making the situation much worse.

Pollak, himself a veteran of The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, Tulsa King and decades of film and television, has worked with enough personalities to make his “not even a competition” assessment feel pointed. He was not naming the most famous actor, the most demanding actor or the most technically gifted actor. He was naming the one whose off-camera mythology apparently came with recurring characters, political history and a hotel-room soundtrack.

The legend survives because the details are impossible

Hollywood has never been short on stories about actors who were intense, private or eccentric. Most of them blur together: the method habits, the late arrivals, the mysterious dietary rules. Torn’s legend has more texture. It includes a paranoia loop, a Nixon callback and a list made by a neighboring couple who decided the only reasonable response was archival.

That is the magic of Pollak’s memory. It does not try to tidy Torn into a saint, a villain or a misunderstood genius. It leaves him as a force of nature with excellent line delivery and apparently no interest in letting a hotel corridor remain quiet.

Some actors leave behind a filmography. Rip Torn left behind a filmography and the feeling that, somewhere, someone is still telling a story about the time he made an entire production wonder who was next.

DON'T GO ANYWHEREUP NEXT ↓
SOCIALOCT 19, 2026

Taylor Swift Turned the Academy Museum Gala Into Her Own Sparkling Movie Premiere

In a pale-blue Dior gown and a glittering performance look, Swift debuted “The Fate of Ophelia” live for a room packed with Hollywood royalty.

Taylor Swift did not merely attend the Academy Museum Gala. She arrived looking like the missing heiress in a very expensive fairy tale, then turned the evening into a miniature Taylor Swift festival.

Swift, 36, took the stage Saturday night at the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures’ sixth annual gala in Los Angeles for her first live performance of “The Fate of Ophelia,” the chart-topping song that has already become one of the defining titles in her current era. Videos shared online captured the debut, which came after Swift had already made a red-carpet entrance in a pale-blue Dior gown that practically demanded its own orchestral score.

The dress was strapless, floor-length and made from pleated silk, with a beaded bow providing the kind of polished finishing touch that says Cinderella, if Cinderella had a global stadium tour and a personal relationship with dramatic album rollouts.

The song got its live-action close-up

For the performance itself, Swift changed into a strapless sparkling gown and moved through a set built for a room that understood both cinema and spectacle. Alongside “The Fate of Ophelia,” she performed “Love Story,” “Blank Space” and “I Knew It, I Knew You,” her original song from “Toy Story 5.”

That set list had a neat little Taylor-verse logic to it. “Love Story” is the fairytale classic; “Blank Space” is the razor-sharp character study; “The Fate of Ophelia” brings the doomed-literary-drama energy; and “I Knew It, I Knew You” places her squarely in the business of making even an animated movie soundtrack feel like an event.

Swift has been treating live appearances as carefully timed punctuation rather than routine promotion. In June, she surprised the crowd at Travis Kelce’s Tight Ends & Friends concert by joining Lainey Wilson for “Love Story.” Earlier that month, she performed “I Knew It, I Knew You” at the Los Angeles premiere of “Toy Story 5,” where she also joined Randy Newman for “You’ve Got a Friend in Me.” Now, at the Academy Museum Gala, she has given another major song its first stage life.

It is a very Swiftian way to keep the public conversation moving: do not simply release the song, let everyone wonder when and where it will become a moment.

Hollywood’s fanciest room got a pop-star intermission

The audience was stacked with the sort of names that make a gala photo feel like a studio lot with better lighting. The evening honored filmmaker and composer John Carpenter, Oscar nominee Colman Domingo and Oscar winner Charlize Theron. Gala co-chairs Tom Ford, Robert Rodriguez, Steven Spielberg and Kate Capshaw were also in attendance, while the host committee included Jessica Alba, Adrien Brody, Georgina Chapman, Kirsten Dunst, Regina Hall, Kate Hudson, Jessica Lange, Greta Lee, John Legend, Chrissy Teigen, Rami Malek, Demi Moore, Olivia Munn, Da’Vine Joy Randolph, Seth Rogen and Teyana Taylor.

That crowd gives Swift’s performance a particular kind of gloss. This was not a conventional concert stop or an awards-show medley engineered around a trophy. It was a room devoted to film, surrounded by people who understand the mechanics of image-making, suddenly watching one of pop’s most controlled image-makers put on a show.

The Academy Museum announced Swift’s appearance on Oct. 8, with museum director and president Amy Homma calling her “an extraordinary talent whose work resonates around the world.” The booking made sense on paper. Swift’s recent public career has increasingly blurred the line between musician, director, actor-adjacent cultural figure and full-time curator of her own mythology.

From the VMAs to the museum, she is still making entrances

The gala was Swift’s biggest public appearance since the 2026 MTV Video Music Awards, where she made history by surpassing Beyoncé as the show’s most-awarded artist. At that ceremony, she accepted the inaugural MTV VMA Artist Director Honors from Dakota Johnson, then used the end of her speech to debut the music video for “Patient Zero,” featuring Johnson and Colin Farrell.

She also accepted Video of the Year for “The Fate of Ophelia,” making the gala performance feel less like a random encore and more like the next chapter in a carefully staged campaign. The song had already won its awards-show coronation; now it received the live treatment in a room where the visual language mattered almost as much as the music.

Swift told the VMA audience that she had been involved in roughly 60 music videos, writing and directing 18 of them, and credited fans for making that work rewarding. The Academy Museum appearance offered another reminder of why her music videos and performances travel so effectively online: they arrive with a clear silhouette, a strong costume and enough narrative bait to keep people replaying the clips.

On this night, the silhouette was unmistakable. Pale-blue Dior on the carpet. Glittering gown under the lights. A title borrowed from tragedy. A room full of movie stars. Taylor Swift has spent years proving that a pop performance can function like a premiere, and at the Academy Museum Gala, she skipped the metaphor entirely.

CELEBSOCT 19, 2026

Romee Strijd Says Victoria’s Secret Rejection Came With a Plot Twist: “You Were Already Released”

The former Angel thought she was still waiting on an answer. Victoria’s Secret says she had been formally released from casting weeks earlier, turning one runway snub into a very awkward industry game of telephone.

There is rejection, and then there is rejection with a completely different version of events attached.

Romee Strijd, the Dutch model who walked the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show from 2014 through 2018, has revealed that she was not selected for the 2026 show. That alone would be a headline: a former Angel, a familiar face from one of the brand’s most recognizable eras, not making the comeback runway many fans might have expected.

But the real drama arrived in the explanation. According to Strijd, she believed she was still waiting for clarity during the casting process. Then, she says, she was told by her modeling agency that she had already been “released.” Victoria’s Secret, meanwhile, says the brand and casting director Piergiorgio Del Moro had formally released her from the process on September 6 — and that the message was sent directly to her representation.

Which leaves Romee standing in the most fashion-industry-specific nightmare imaginable: not just being turned down, but apparently finding out that the people handling the news may have been working from a different script.

The former Angel who thought the door was still open

Strijd’s history with Victoria’s Secret makes the moment feel more loaded than a standard model casting update. She was part of the show between 2014 and 2018, when the production was still operating as a major pop-culture event rather than merely another stop on the fashion calendar. In 2018, she was chosen to wear the Shooting Star Swarovski look during the finale section — the kind of high-glam placement that permanently associates a model with the brand’s visual mythology.

So when Strijd spoke about the 2026 casting, she was not presenting herself as a stranger hoping for a lucky break. She was talking about a former face of the franchise trying to understand whether there was still a place for her in its latest chapter.

In a video posted to social media earlier in the week, Strijd said she had asked whether there was a specific reason she was not cast because she would have appreciated more explanation. The answer, as she relayed it, was: “You were already released.”

Her frustration was not framed as a tantrum over losing a runway spot. It was about the time and uncertainty wrapped around the process. Strijd said she had been asking IMG for an update during the preceding weeks and noted that, with two children and a family to run, the casting process demanded a meaningful amount of her time.

That detail gives the story its sting. Fashion loves to package rejection as mystique — a model simply appears, disappears, and lets the clothes do the talking. Strijd’s comments pulled the curtain back on the less glamorous part: calendars, agency updates, unanswered questions and the professional cost of being left hanging.

Victoria’s Secret has a different version of the timeline

Victoria’s Secret responded through a representative, who told Vanity Fair that Strijd “holds an important place” within the brand and that it deeply values her long relationship with the company and her career dedication.

Then came the key clarification: the brand said Victoria’s Secret and casting director Piergiorgio Del Moro communicated directly with Strijd’s representation and formally released her from casting on September 6.

The statement carefully kept the focus on the agency pipeline rather than contradicting Strijd’s account of how the news reached her. “While we cannot speak to the communications between talent and representation,” the representative said, “Victoria’s Secret values and respects all talent partners—past, present and future.”

It is a polished corporate statement, but it also quietly relocates the awkwardness. From the brand’s perspective, the process was completed. From Strijd’s perspective, the process apparently did not feel completed because she was still trying to get an update. Both things can exist at once, which is exactly why this is more interesting than a basic “model rejected from fashion show” story.

The phrase “formally released” is doing particularly elegant work here. It sounds definitive, administrative and very finished. Strijd’s version sounds more human: she was asking questions, waiting for information and then learning that the decision had supposedly already been made. Somewhere between those two descriptions is an industry communication gap with excellent headline instincts.

Strijd is closing the chapter, even if the runway keeps moving

Strijd said she was fine with the rejection itself and ended her video on a notably restrained note. She said she believed the show would be good, called the situation a closed chapter and added that she did not think she would go through casting again in the future because she disliked how the process unfolded and how she felt treated.

That is a very different energy from publicly burning down the brand. She did not dismiss the show or pretend her history with Victoria’s Secret meant she was automatically entitled to a place in the lineup. Instead, she separated the outcome from the experience. Not getting cast was one thing. Being unclear about where she stood was another.

And that distinction matters for a brand still trying to make every runway appearance feel like an event. A former Angel discussing the behind-the-scenes mechanics of not making the cut is an accidental reminder that the fantasy is built on a highly practical machine — casting directors, agencies, deadlines and decisions that have to travel through several layers before they reach the person whose career is directly affected.

Strijd’s comments also put a slightly surreal spin on the usual comeback narrative. Fashion audiences love a return: the familiar model, the archive reference, the face from a previous era reappearing under new lighting. But nostalgia does not guarantee access. A past association can make a rejection feel more dramatic, while the business itself may already be moving in another direction.

For now, Strijd says she wants to keep the positive memories, which is probably the most gracious exit available after a process that left her asking who knew what, and when. Victoria’s Secret says she was formally released weeks before the show. Strijd says she was told a version of that only after seeking an explanation.

The runway will go on. The more revealing question is whether anyone in the agency group chat realized the chapter had ended before Romee did.