Khloé Kardashian Has Already Named Her Possible Frozen-Embryo Baby—and It’s Extremely Khloé
The reality star told Kris Jenner that “Tyla, True, Tatum” would be the cutest sibling trio, even as she admits another child may be more than she can handle.
Khloé Kardashian has a name ready for a baby who does not technically exist yet, may never exist at all, and—depending on how this family conversation evolves—could arrive via a surrogate carrying an embryo created with her ex, Tristan Thompson. Naturally, the name is Tyla.
“Tyla, True, Tatum—how cute!” Khloé told her mother, Kris Jenner, in the Oct. 16 episode of The Kardashians. The name would keep the family’s current alliterative-adjacent rhythm intact: True, Tatum, Tyla. It is cute. It is coordinated. It sounds like a Kardashian family group chat already approved it.
But the bigger story is not the name. It is the very Kardashian-specific logistical puzzle behind it: a possible third child, frozen embryos, an ex-boyfriend who would remain permanently connected to the household, and a woman who says she is not sure she has the bandwidth to begin the baby years again.
Meet Tyla, a baby who currently exists mostly in conversation
The idea began with True, Khloé’s daughter with Tristan. After learning that her mother still has frozen embryos in storage, True apparently became focused on the idea that she has “a sister in the freezer.” Khloé said she told people about it, giving the phrase the kind of eerie-cute momentum only a child can create.
Khloé explained that she had been speaking with a doctor when she said the line out loud. She also said she legally owns the embryos outright after reaching an agreement with Tristan. That detail turns a funny family anecdote into a genuinely complicated future decision: the embryos are tied to a previous relationship, but Khloé is the person deciding whether they ever become part of her next chapter.
True’s preferred outcome is apparently simple: a baby sister. Khloé’s is more conditional. She told Kris that she would love another daughter, and that she believes every girl needs a sister, but she is also aware that another child would change the carefully arranged world she has built around True and Tatum.
Khloé’s ideal future does not include a second co-parenting saga
Khloé has been candid about the unusual position she occupies: she shares two children with Tristan, but she does not appear to be describing a romantic reunion. The two have continued to navigate family life around True and Tatum, and their children remain the center of the public-facing relationship between them.
In the episode, Khloé said she has been celibate for nearly five years. She also admitted that, ideally, she would be with someone else without having more children with that person. That is less a traditional romantic fantasy than a carefully drafted household policy.
“I don’t want me and my husband to have kids, and then my kids feel, ‘Oh, we’re not as important because their daddy lives in this house,’” she said. It is an unusually clear-eyed concern for a reality-TV conversation about hypothetical babies: Khloé is not just imagining the nursery or the name. She is thinking about the emotional architecture of the family already in place.
Her point is that marriage can end, but children create a permanent connection. “When you have a baby, it’s forever,” she said, before adding, “So, choose widely.” In Kardashian language, that is practically a legal disclaimer stamped in gold.
There is also the question of whether a future husband would be comfortable with the arrangement. Kris was skeptical that “Prince Charming” would happily sign up for a marriage involving an embryo created with Khloé’s ex. Khloé’s proposed solution was blunt: either the surrogate is already pregnant, or she will not have another baby.
It is an oddly cinematic plan, and also very on-brand for a family whose major life events have long arrived with a camera crew nearby. No slow, awkward relationship summit. No extended domestic referendum. Just: surprise, the surrogate is pregnant.
The Tristan factor is the part nobody can casually name away
True and Tatum are already part of a blended family that includes Tristan’s older son, Prince, whom he shares with ex Jordan Craig. Publicly shared family moments have shown the children spending time together, including at Tatum’s birthday celebration. That history matters because a third child would not simply add another Kardashian kid to the roster; it would deepen an already intricate web of siblings, half-siblings and co-parenting ties.
Khloé’s comments also land differently because her relationship with Tristan has been marked by public upheaval, reconciliation attempts and painful revelations. The point of this conversation is not to reopen every chapter, but the emotional math is impossible to ignore: a baby created from the relationship would be permanent even if the romance is not.
That is why Khloé’s hesitation feels more revealing than the baby name itself. She is not presenting Tyla as an announcement. She is presenting the name as a possibility she finds charming while remaining unsure whether she wants to reopen the entire experience of pregnancy, surrogacy and permanent co-parenting.
She has also spoken about getting older and questioning whether she can handle another child. That tension—wanting another daughter while being realistic about the labor involved—is the least glossy and most relatable part of the whole thing. The Kardashian machine can make almost anything look effortless, but Khloé is acknowledging that a third baby would be a major disruption, not just a sweet addition to the family photos.
For now, Tyla is the family’s most adorable hypothetical
True remains laser-focused on her frozen-in-storage sister. Khloé remains fond of the name. Kris remains unconvinced that a future husband would be thrilled by the backstory. And the embryo remains exactly where it is.
That leaves Tyla in the perfect Kardashian limbo: fully named, emotionally discussed, legally complicated and not actually on the way—at least not based on anything Khloé said in the episode.
The name itself may be the easiest part. True, Tatum and Tyla do have a polished little rhythm, the kind of sibling set that looks ready for matching pajamas and an expertly coordinated holiday card. But Khloé’s real dilemma is whether the aesthetic is worth the upheaval.
She may eventually decide that another daughter belongs in the family. She may decide that her household is already complete. For now, she has something almost as Kardashian as a baby announcement: a potential baby with a perfect name, a complicated backstory and absolutely no guarantee of showing up.
Hilary Swank’s Glow-Stick Pregnancy Reveal Came With a Message for the Age Police
At 52, the Oscar winner is expecting her third child — and she is done pretending the public applies the same parenting rules to women and men.
Hilary Swank did not announce her third pregnancy with a gauzy maternity shoot, a carefully staged beach walk or a caption that sounded like it had been approved by six publicists and a moon-circle. She and husband Philip Schneider turned off the lights, taped glow sticks to their clothes, pulled their twins into the frame and danced.
Then Swank, 52, added the punchline: “A lot of people have been asking what project I’m doing next, this one releases in December. 😉👼🏼🫶🏼”
It was playful, unmistakably Swank and just cryptic enough to make the internet do the work. The “project” is baby No. 3, arriving after the couple welcomed twins Aya and Ohm in 2023, when Swank was 48. But the announcement quickly became more than a celebrity-family reveal. It reopened the familiar, exhausting public debate about women having children later in life — a conversation that somehow remains much less urgent when the parent in question is a man.
Now Swank is addressing that backlash directly, in a conversation with Drew Barrymore set to air Oct. 20. And yes, the exchange has the exact energy you would expect from two famous women comparing notes on the strange little courtroom where society puts mothers on trial.
The “How dare you?” brigade has entered the chat
In a clip from the upcoming interview, Swank recalled a woman confronting her over becoming a mother at an older age. The woman’s concern, according to Swank, was that older parents could die while their children are still in their 20s. Her own father had been her “favorite person,” Swank said, and his death when she was in her 20s had been devastating.
That is a painful fear, not a ridiculous one. Swank did not flatten the woman’s experience into cartoon villainy, and she did not pretend grief is theoretical. Her response was more complicated — and more affecting — than the usual celebrity clapback.
“I would rather be born and have that person that was my favorite person and experience that than not at all,” she said.
Swank connected the woman’s story to her own relationship with her father, whom she also described as one of her favorite people on earth. The point was not that loss does not matter. It was that the possibility of loss does not erase the value of a life, a family or a bond that might not otherwise exist.
Still, the public conversation around older mothers rarely stays that nuanced for long. It tends to arrive wrapped in concern, then quietly unwrap itself into judgment. Women are asked to defend their timelines, their bodies, their fertility and their future children’s hypothetical feelings, often by people who would never dream of interrogating an older father with the same intensity.
Drew Barrymore was ready with the double-standard line
Barrymore, who has two children and has spoken about becoming a mother in her 40s, called the double standard “weird.” She pointed out that men have babies in their 80s — “and that’s not a euphemism or a joke,” she said.
That line lands because it is both funny and painfully obvious. The culture has somehow decided that an older man starting or expanding a family is evidence of vitality, romance or a late-life renaissance. An older woman doing the same thing becomes a think piece, a warning label and an unsolicited medical panel in the comments.
Swank noted that Barrymore had children in her 40s and that “people weren’t always gracious about it.” That shared understanding gives the clip its particular charge. This is not a debate happening in the abstract between two hosts reading talking points. It is two mothers discussing the way women’s private family decisions can become public property the second they stray from an approved schedule.
And the approved schedule is apparently narrow: old enough to be responsible, young enough to satisfy strangers, famous enough to be scrutinized and private enough not to complain about it. Good luck with that.
The announcement itself was pure Swank: warm, weird and impossible to mistake
Swank’s pregnancy reveal worked because it did not feel like an apology. In the video, she, Schneider and their twins danced in what appeared to be glow sticks taped to their outfits, with Swank’s bump transformed into the family’s brightest prop. It was a family announcement, but it had the low-lit chaos of a homemade music video — more “we have news” than “please admire our tasteful beige nursery.”
The tone matters. Swank did not present the pregnancy as a strategic reinvention or a carefully packaged lesson. She made it look joyful, a little silly and very much like a family moment that happened to be posted online. The wink in the caption kept the reveal from becoming overly solemn, while the angel emoji made the meaning clear enough for anyone who missed the joke.
She was later photographed arriving at The Drew Barrymore Show in New York with her baby bump visible, bringing the announcement from glow-stick family theater into daytime-TV conversation. The timing gives the story a neat two-act structure: first, the soft-launch-with-a-punchline; then, the public discussion about why women are still expected to explain themselves for having the lives they want.
Swank and Schneider welcomed their twins in 2023, and the Oscar winner previously spoke about the benefits she saw in having children later in life. Now, with a third baby on the way, she is making the emotional case in a different register: not that age is irrelevant, but that the fear attached to older motherhood should not be allowed to drown out the love.
There is no grand celebrity feud here, no messy ex and no suspiciously timed unfollow to investigate. Just a famous woman announcing a wanted pregnancy, a family dancing in the dark and the internet once again discovering that it has opinions about a stranger’s reproductive calendar.
Swank’s answer is refreshingly unglamorous in the best way. She is not trying to win every commenter over. She is saying that the relationship itself — the favorite person, the ordinary days, the enormous love and even the inevitable grief — can be worth having. And if men are allowed to make that choice without being treated like a societal emergency, women might reasonably want the same freedom.
Dakota Johnson and Machine Gun Kelly Just Gave Their Rumor Era Another Night Out
A month after their first public hang, the pair slipped into a Hollywood speakeasy together—and Dakota has already warned everyone that musicians are “tricky motherf--kers.”
Hollywood romance rumors usually begin with a dinner, a blurry sidewalk photo and one person suddenly discovering the concept of “just friends.” Dakota Johnson and Machine Gun Kelly have now moved on to the next stage: repeated public appearances with the kind of casual choreography that makes the internet sit up straighter.
The pair were seen arriving together at Say Yes, a speakeasy and cocktail lounge in Hollywood on Oct. 14, according to footage obtained by DeuxMoi and reported by E! News. Johnson walked behind Kelly as they entered, while the rapper—whose real name is Colson Baker—greeted a passerby and appeared to be in good spirits.
Nothing about the outing screamed red-carpet hard launch. That is precisely why people are talking about it. Johnson wore a dark leather jacket over a white cropped tank and pants, with her sleek signature hair doing what it always does: looking expensive while pretending none of this is a big deal. Kelly went full low-profile celebrity, dressed in black with his hood pulled over his head.
It was not exactly an invisibility cloak. It was more “I would like privacy, but I am also entering a Hollywood cocktail lounge with Dakota Johnson.”
The soft launch has entered its second act
This was not the first time Johnson and Kelly have been spotted together. On Sept. 12, the Bigger Splash actress and the “Bad Things” artist went out in New York City, just weeks after Johnson’s breakup from musician Role Model was confirmed. The appearance immediately landed in the category of “interesting timing,” because celebrity romance watchers are nothing if not calendar literate.
Then came Milan. Johnson was seen watching Kelly walk the runway at Vogue World 2026 on Sept. 22, adding another public sighting to a connection that had previously been easy to dismiss as one friendly night out. The two had also crossed paths at Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s July wedding, a guest list so starry that merely being in the same room proves absolutely nothing—but does provide excellent future gossip infrastructure.
Now there have been multiple hangouts over the course of a month, in two cities, with the latest one happening in Johnson’s Los Angeles orbit. Fans think the pattern looks romantic. Neither Johnson nor Kelly has addressed the speculation, which leaves the public to do what it does best: turn a cocktail-lounge entrance into a serialized drama.
Of course, Dakota has thoughts about musicians
The timing is especially delicious because Johnson has already offered a public warning label for the musician species. In a Sept. 18 interview with Vogue, the Materialists actress was told that she “knows a lot of musicians.”
“They like me,” she replied. “I don’t know what to say.”
When the interviewer followed up with, “What’s not to like?,” Johnson laughed and answered: “A lot! A lot. Tricky motherf–kers.”
That comment came after Johnson’s eight-year relationship with Coldplay frontman Chris Martin ended in 2025, and shortly after her breakup from Role Model. So yes, there is a certain self-aware comedy to the internet now watching her appear with another musician while she has publicly described musicians as, essentially, charming little hazards.
But Johnson has never suggested that her dating history is a neatly curated brand strategy. Her relationship with Martin was long and highly scrutinized, while her newer outings with Kelly have arrived with no announcement, no couple selfie and no caption designed to make the tabloids combust. For now, the vibe is less “meet my boyfriend” and more “we happened to enter the same building at the same time,” repeated until the distinction starts to feel extremely theoretical.
MGK is no stranger to a headline-making romantic orbit
Kelly also brings his own mythology to the situation. The “Lonely Road” artist has spent years existing at the intersection of music, fashion and celebrity relationship news, so a low-key entrance beside Johnson was never likely to remain low-key for long.
His current public image is built for this exact kind of sighting: a little rock star, a little runway regular, a little deliberately elusive. The hood, the black clothes, the cheerful greeting to a passerby—every detail feels like it belongs to a celebrity trying to be casual while operating in a world where casual is content.
Johnson, by contrast, has a cooler, drier approach to public attention. She has previously pushed back on the culture of constant romantic speculation. E! News notes that she once told people speculating about her relationships to “get a life,” which makes this latest round of interest feel like the universe testing her patience with a particularly well-dressed pop quiz.
There is also the fact that Johnson and Kelly are not emerging from nowhere. They have crossed paths in a dense celebrity social circle, and their connection has unfolded through public events and outings rather than one explosive declaration. That makes the story less like a surprise engagement announcement and more like a slow-burn subplot: a few sightings, one fashion week appearance, a lounge entrance, and a suspicious amount of collective attention.
The internet loves a musician pattern
Part of the fascination is the familiar celebrity formula: actor meets musician, musician meets actor, everyone insists nothing is happening, and the public starts assembling a relationship narrative from outerwear.
Johnson has long been linked to musicians, including Martin and Role Model. Kelly’s own public romantic history has also kept him firmly inside the celebrity relationship conversation. Put those two trajectories together and the cultural math becomes irresistible, even if the people involved have not supplied a conclusion.
Still, the most interesting detail may be how little the pair appears to be forcing. There is no dramatic PDA in the account of the Los Angeles outing, no social-media announcement and no quote from either star turning the speculation into a formal storyline. Just Johnson in a leather jacket, Kelly in a hood, and another night where they chose to arrive at the same place.
That is enough to keep the rumor machine humming. It is also very on-brand for the current celebrity dating landscape, where the soft launch is no longer one strategically cropped hand in an Instagram carousel. Sometimes it is simply walking ten feet behind someone into a speakeasy and letting the internet write the rest.