BAD GOSS / 24•7THE GOSSIP IS BAD. THE TASTE IS IMPECCABLE.SEARCH ↗
BADGOSS⌕
CELEBSOCT 11, 2026

Olivia Culpo and Christian McCaffrey Just Went From One Under Two to a Family of Four

The couple welcomed Roman Augustus McCaffrey nearly 15 months after daughter Colette — and Culpo’s “Heart is exploding” update has officially made their very polished family era a two-under-two production.

Olivia Culpo and Christian McCaffrey have added another tiny person to their already camera-ready household, and the name is giving Roman holiday, old-money stationery, and a baby who will somehow look better in a knit onesie than most adults look in formalwear.

The couple announced Saturday that they welcomed their second child, Roman Augustus McCaffrey, on Sept. 29. Culpo shared the news in a joint Instagram post with McCaffrey, captioning it simply with the baby’s name and a white heart. The slideshow featured the new family of four: Culpo and McCaffrey holding Roman, while their 1-year-old daughter, Colette, stepped into her new role as big sister.

“Heart is exploding,” Culpo wrote on her Instagram Stories. Frankly, that is the only appropriate caption when your household has just gone from one baby to two and your toddler is suddenly the senior member of the sibling division.

Meet Roman Augustus, the newest McCaffrey

Roman’s arrival gives the Culpo-McCaffrey family a neat new shape, though the timing has been anything but a slow, carefully staged expansion. Colette was born in July 2025, and the couple conceived their second child six months after Culpo’s C-section. Culpo previously acknowledged that the pregnancy was not something she had planned so soon.

“I did not think that this was going to happen the way that it did,” she said in a TikTok shared in May, as reported by Page Six. She also described herself as not “totally healed” and said she had only just started to feel like she was getting her groove back. She had been working out and noticing her abs returning, then found herself confronting the reality that her body had other priorities.

That is a particularly Culpo kind of plot twist: a perfectly timed return-to-self arc interrupted by a second baby. One minute, the postpartum comeback montage; the next, a new nursery, another car seat, and a family group chat permanently dominated by nap updates.

The couple chose not to find out the baby’s sex before the birth, just as they did with Colette. Culpo had previously said that waiting would be “such a nice surprise” and that being healthy was the main thing they could ask for. Her intuition had told her in March 2025 that she was having a boy, but Colette arrived instead. This time, the surprise has a name that sounds ready for a very serious birth announcement in a very glossy magazine.

From “best birthday gift” to baby No. 2

Culpo announced her second pregnancy in May with maternity-shoot photos featuring McCaffrey and Colette. “Best birthday gift,” she wrote, adding, “Baby #2 coming soon.” The post arrived less than a year after the couple’s wedding and just months before the birth of their first child, making this one of those celebrity timelines that seems to move at streaming-drama speed.

Culpo and McCaffrey began dating in 2019, got engaged in 2023, and married in June 2024. They announced they were expecting their first child the following month. By the time Colette arrived in July 2025, the couple had already moved from long-running romance to newlywed life to parenthood with the efficiency of people who do not appear to enjoy leaving a calendar blank.

Before becoming a mother, Culpo had spoken openly about her worries over whether pregnancy would be possible for her because of endometriosis. On an episode of her family’s reality series, “The Culpo Sisters,” she said in 2022 that she wanted children but wanted to make sure she could have them. That history gives the latest announcement more emotional weight than a standard celebrity baby slideshow: the family she once feared might be difficult to build is now growing faster than expected.

It also explains why the announcement lands as more than just another famous couple adding a baby to the roster. Culpo has been candid about the physical and emotional whiplash of pregnancy, recovery, body changes and the pressure to feel like herself again immediately. Her comments about seeing her abs return before discovering that her body was preparing for another pregnancy were candid in a way celebrity motherhood updates often are not.

The family-of-four soft launch is complete

The joint post keeps the reveal centered on the family rather than turning Roman into a solo celebrity cameo. There is Culpo, there is McCaffrey, there is baby Roman, and there is Colette looking very much like the person who will eventually decide whether the new arrival is allowed anywhere near her toys.

That first glimpse of Colette as a big sister is the real social-media hook. Celebrity babies are generally introduced in the same few visual languages — tiny hand, swaddled foot, tasteful blanket, perhaps a parent’s emotional caption — but adding a toddler to the frame instantly changes the energy. This is no longer just a birth announcement. It is the beginning of a sibling storyline, complete with matching outfits, family vacations, birthday-party content and the inevitable future photos in which Roman is trying to escape while Colette understands the assignment.

Culpo’s public style has always leaned polished, from her pageant background to the highly curated maternity looks and family images that have followed. But the latest update is charmingly uncomplicated: a name, a date, a slideshow and one very full heart. No dramatic rollout was required. The family had already supplied the plot.

For now, Roman Augustus McCaffrey is the newest member of a family that has spent the past few years moving through romance, marriage, parenthood and an unexpectedly rapid sequel. Culpo and McCaffrey have not announced anything beyond the birth itself, but the message is clear enough: the McCaffrey household is officially in its two-under-two era, and Colette has been promoted.

DON'T GO ANYWHEREUP NEXT ↓
CELEBSOCT 11, 2026

Gwyneth Officiated, Katy Sat by Adam, and the Lowes Had a Very Famous Wedding Weekend

Matthew Lowe married Emily Markus in Santa Barbara with Gwyneth Paltrow at the altar and half of Hollywood in the audience — a glittering family celebration arriving during an intensely painful chapter for the Lowe clan.

Some weddings have a seating chart. This one had a celebrity ecosystem.

Matthew Lowe, the eldest son of Rob Lowe and Sheryl Berkoff, married Emily Markus in Santa Barbara on Saturday, turning a private family milestone into the kind of starry gathering that practically arrives with its own group chat. Gwyneth Paltrow officiated. Cameron Diaz sat beside Zoe Saldaña and Marco Perego-Saldaña. Katy Perry was spotted in front of Adam Levine and Behati Prinsloo. Chris Pratt was seated away from wife Katherine Schwarzenegger and several members of her family. Maria Shriver appeared with a cluster of her children, including Christina, Christopher and Patrick Schwarzenegger, who attended with Abby Champion.

In other words: this was less “wedding guest list” and more “Hollywood family tree with assigned seating.”

Gwyneth Paltrow, wedding officiant: a very Goop-coded choice

Paltrow taking the ceremony is the detail that gives the whole event its particular Los Angeles sheen. The Oscar winner and lifestyle mogul officiated while her husband, Brad Falchuk, was also photographed at the festivities alongside Rob Lowe and Berkoff.

It is a perfect bit of celebrity-world connective tissue: Paltrow is not merely a famous person who showed up for the photos, but someone close enough to the family orbit to stand at the altar. The result is a wedding that feels intimate and extraordinarily famous at the same time — the social equivalent of bumping into three different friend groups at the same restaurant, except every table contains a household name.

Page Six published exclusive photos from the celebration, which was said to take place at a private residence in Santa Barbara. The images capture the familiar wedding-day tableau — family in the front row, friends chatting across aisles, glamorous guests apparently attempting to behave like normal people while sitting next to other glamorous guests.

The seating chart had its own plot

Katy Perry’s placement in front of Adam Levine and Behati Prinsloo immediately supplies the sort of visual that makes a wedding feel like an awards-season afterparty. Cameron Diaz sat with Saldaña and Perego-Saldaña, while Pratt was photographed apart from Schwarzenegger and some of her relatives.

That last detail is exactly the kind of thing the internet can turn into a conspiracy board in under six minutes, but a seating arrangement is still just a seating arrangement. Weddings are logistical beasts. People get placed where there is room, where family dynamics make sense, or wherever the planner’s spreadsheet sends them. The photo is fun; it does not automatically come with a subplot.

Shriver’s row was another reminder that this was a deeply interwoven Southern California affair. Her children appeared together, with Katherine seated behind them and photographed chatting with Patrick. The Lowes, Schwarzeneggers and a long list of Hollywood friends have overlapped socially for years, so the guest list reads less like a random roll call than a map of a particularly well-connected extended community.

A sunset sneak peek before the famous faces arrived

Before the ceremony, Markus offered a small glimpse of the weekend on Instagram Stories: a sunset view of tables and festive flags at local restaurant Bluewater Grill, captioned, “It’s wedding weekend eve!” It was the kind of soft-launch wedding content that gives followers just enough atmosphere without handing over the entire event.

No overproduced reveal, no exhaustive carousel, no suspiciously sponsored champagne tower — just sunset, tables and the promise that something big was about to happen. Then came Paltrow at the altar and a guest list that could have doubled as a late-night talk-show lineup.

Matthew, 33, is Rob and Berkoff’s eldest son. The couple, married for 35 years, also share John Owen Lowe, 30. John Owen has become a recognizable public figure in his own right, particularly through his acting and social-media presence, but this weekend placed the focus on his brother and new sister-in-law.

A joyful weekend in a painful family chapter

The wedding took place less than two weeks after the death of Matthew and John Owen’s cousin, Fiona Lowe, the 13-year-old daughter of Rob’s brother Chad Lowe and producer Kim Painter. Fiona’s family described her as smart, creative, loving and passionate about dance in a statement shared with Page Six, while asking for privacy and prayers.

Her death was later determined to be suicide, according to Los Angeles Medical Examiner records obtained by Page Six. The timing places Matthew’s wedding in an especially complicated emotional space: a major celebration arriving while the family was still grieving a devastating loss.

That tension is visible in the broader public story around the Lowes. Chad recently returned to social media by sharing a clip from Olivia Hunt’s “On Healing” podcast, while John Owen posted lines from Emily Dickinson’s “Hope” after Fiona’s death. The poem’s image of hope as “the thing with feathers” became a quiet expression of endurance during a period when the family had little public to say and even less reason to say it.

The wedding itself was not presented as a statement about moving on, and there is no reason to force one onto it. Families do not grieve in a single uninterrupted mood. They gather, they show up, they stand beside one another, and sometimes they celebrate a marriage while carrying something unbearably sad into the room. The famous faces and polished Santa Barbara setting may make the weekend look glossy, but the family context is anything but simple.

Still, the wedding offered a snapshot of the Lowe circle doing what close families often do in difficult seasons: surrounding one another. Rob and Berkoff sat in the front row. John Owen was there. Paltrow helped lead the ceremony. Friends from across Hollywood filled the seats. And Emily Markus, after teasing the festivities with one sunset Story, became a bride at the center of one of the most star-studded family gatherings of the year.

It was glamorous, crowded and unmistakably personal — a celebration with a guest list built for gossip, but a family reality that demands a little more care than the photographs alone can show.

If you or someone you know is struggling with thoughts of suicide, call or text 988 to reach the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline.

CELEBSOCT 11, 2026

Prince Harry and Prince William’s Family Reunion Goes Full ‘SNL UK’ — With a Side of Pizza Express

The royal brothers’ long-running feud gets a sharply silly Sandringham makeover, while Meghan’s ‘Suits’ past and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s scandals become the punchlines nobody at the table can escape.

There are awkward family reunions, and then there are awkward family reunions staged at Sandringham, with the entire British monarchy invited and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor apparently holding the seating chart.

That is the comic nightmare at the center of the latest SNL UK cold open, which turned Prince Harry and Prince William’s very real, very public estrangement into a royal-household farce. The Oct. 10 sketch imagines Harry and Meghan Markle being tricked into an encounter with William and Kate Middleton, before King Charles, Queen Camilla and Andrew pile into the room like the world’s most combustible dinner party.

It is less a family reunion than a group chat nobody should have rejoined. And naturally, the jokes arrive dressed in the particular language of royal shade: titles, old insults, former jobs and one deeply unfortunate Pizza Express reference.

Welcome to Sandringham, Please Don’t Make Eye Contact

In the sketch, Harry and Meghan are lured to Sandringham by Andrew, played by George Fouracres. The setup is already deliciously doomed: the Duke and Duchess of Sussex walk through the royal residence, reminiscing about the place while apparently unaware that William and Kate are about to appear.

Meghan, played by Ayoade Bamgboye, points out the spot where Harry’s grandfather allegedly asked whether she was related to Beyoncé. Harry, played by Jack Shep, adds his own family jab: this is also where the late royal asked whether he was related to him.

It is the kind of joke that works because the royal family’s mystique has been repeatedly punctured by these oddly ordinary, often baffling interactions. The palace may come with centuries of history, but the family banter remains aggressively human — and sometimes sounds like it was written during a tense car ride home.

Then William and Kate arrive, played by Freddie Meredith and Annabel Marlow, and the room’s temperature drops several degrees. William greets Harry with the nickname “Prince Ginger Pubes,” a deliberately juvenile insult that sounds less like a future king addressing his brother and more like a schoolyard bully who has just discovered the concept of branding.

Harry fires back that he has already asked William not to call him that because he does not have a comeback. It is a beautifully pathetic exchange: the brothers are supposedly locked in a historic feud, yet the best ammunition available is playground-level name-calling.

Meghan Gets the ‘Suits’ Treatment

Kate then takes aim at Meghan’s acting career, referring to her as “the woman from Suits.” Harry’s answer — “She’s not on Suits anymore. She doesn’t do anything anymore” — is the sketch’s nastiest little turn.

It lands because it lets the comedy play with several versions of Meghan at once: the former television actor, the duchess who stepped away from full-time royal duties, and the celebrity whose every career move is still examined through the royal lens. The line is not subtle, but subtlety has never exactly been the house style of an imaginary royal reunion.

Meghan’s Suits past has long remained one of the easiest shorthand jokes about her public identity. Before she became one of the most recognizable women in the world, she was known to television audiences as Rachel Zane. Now the role functions almost like a royal-family nickname: a reminder of the life she had before marriage, monarchy and the Sussexes’ break with royal duties became the dominant storyline.

The sketch also understands that Harry and Meghan are funniest, in a satirical sense, when placed inside the machinery they left. Their move to Southern California in 2020 made them global outsiders with unusually intimate knowledge of the institution they had exited. The reported return to the UK in August, partly to be closer to Harry’s father and help their children build relationships with the royal family, gives the writers a fresh comic premise: what if leaving the monarchy did not mean escaping the family group chat?

Charles Tries to End the Conversation. Andrew Makes It Worse.

As if the Harry-William collision were not enough, King Charles and Queen Camilla join the gathering, along with Andrew. The former prince immediately brings up Pizza Express in Woking, a reference tied to one of the most infamous moments in the scandal surrounding him.

When Charles addresses him without his former title, Andrew objects: “That’s Prince Andrew to you.” The exchange lets the sketch take aim at the strange elasticity of royal status — the titles that can be lost, the titles people still insist on using, and the entitlement that somehow survives both.

Charles, played by Larry Dean, responds with a speech that goes far beyond family squabbling. He calls Andrew arrogant and entitled, then skewers the institution itself, referencing centuries of war, tax evasion and slavery before drawing a line at the accusations surrounding Andrew. Andrew’s reply — “I never believed for one moment that my actions would have consequences” — is the sort of blunt punchline that turns a scandal into a character trait.

That section gives the cold open its sharpest edge. Harry and William’s feud is entertaining because it is intimate, recognizable and endlessly replayed in public. Andrew’s presence changes the flavor. Suddenly the sketch is not just about brothers who cannot stop sniping at each other; it is about a family and institution that keep trying to manage their worst headlines in the same room.

The Royal Family Is Still Premium Comedy Material

The timing is almost too neat. Harry and Meghan’s relationship with the royal family remains a permanent source of fascination, particularly as the couple are said to be living back in the UK and hoping for more contact between their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, and the wider family. The public has watched years of distance, interviews, departures and strained reunions play out with the intensity of prestige television.

That gives SNL UK an unusually crowded comedy menu. There is the brotherly feud. There is Kate’s ability to turn one line about Suits into an entire personality judgment. There is Harry’s apparently unbeatable inability to improvise a comeback. There is Charles attempting to restore order while Andrew insists on a title. And there is the surreal fact that the most powerful family in Britain can still be reduced, in sketch-comedy terms, to four people refusing to sit together at dinner.

The joke is not that the feud is resolved. It is that everyone is still performing it. Harry and William remain locked into the roles the public already recognizes: estranged brothers, rival royal narratives, two men who can turn a family gathering into breaking news. Meghan and Kate become shorthand for competing versions of royal womanhood. Charles is the exhausted moderator. Andrew is the guest who should never have been invited but somehow keeps appearing.

By the end, the royal family has not healed, reconciled or even made it through a meal without a historical reference detonating across the table. But they have achieved something arguably more British: turning a deeply uncomfortable family situation into a television cold open and calling it entertainment.

Pass the biscuits. Hide the titles. And absolutely do not ask anyone whether they are related to Beyoncé.