BAD GOSS / 24•7THE GOSSIP IS BAD. THE TASTE IS IMPECCABLE.SEARCH ↗
BADGOSS⌕
CELEBSOCT 5, 2026

Kim Kardashian Has Five Nannies—and Still Says She’s Raising Four Kids Alone

The Skims mogul’s latest parenting confession puts celebrity help, co-parenting with Kanye West and the eternal question of who gets to say they’re exhausted back in the group chat.

Kim Kardashian has five nannies. She also takes her four children to and from school, eats dinner with them every night and still describes herself as feeling, at times, like she is raising them alone.

That is the very Kim Kardashian tension: the life of an ultra-resourced billionaire businesswoman, narrated with the emotional texture of a woman who is nevertheless answering the midnight call. In a new profile with the Sunday Times’ Style Magazine, Kardashian revealed that her nannies rotate so there is always one helping when North, Saint, Chicago and Psalm are with her. The number immediately has the kind of group-chat energy usually reserved for a suspicious soft launch or a celebrity airport outfit: five nannies for four children is not a staffing detail so much as a headline with its own lighting.

But Kardashian’s point was less “look at my childcare empire” than “look at the amount of logistical chaos happening behind the beige walls.” Her children are now 13, 10, 8 and 7, and she remains one of the most aggressively booked people in pop culture. She is filming, producing, running Skims, appearing on The Kardashians, pursuing acting and navigating a relationship with Lewis Hamilton, while still insisting that the ordinary parental rituals belong to her.

The five-nanny detail is shocking. The school run is the flex.

Kardashian told the outlet that she makes sure she is the one taking the children to and from school. She also said she sits down for family dinner every night and reads books with them before bed. “I still have a kid sleep in my bed when they want,” she said, adding that she considers herself an “intermediate-strict parent” who is “extremely patient and loving.”

It is a carefully drawn portrait of hands-on motherhood, but not the Instagram version where the whole operation is disguised as effortless. Kardashian is openly describing the infrastructure. Five nannies are not a failure to parent; they are the workforce required to keep four children, a global company, television production and an intensely public life moving at once. The fascinating part is how quickly the existence of help can become an argument against exhaustion—as if a nanny can be present for the schedule without being present for the particular ache of a child waking up at 2 a.m.

Kardashian already addressed that contradiction in 2024 on the What’s in the Winkler podcast, where she said she felt “alone” in raising her children despite having “great support systems.” She described the middle-of-the-night reality of children sleeping in her bed, kicking and crying. The quote landed because it was not a denial of her resources. It was a complaint about the strange emotional math of motherhood: plenty of assistance can make the work more manageable without making the responsibility feel any less personal.

She also said she does not talk about those struggles often because she expects people to judge her. That judgment arrived preloaded years ago, when she described herself as her children’s “main provider” and Kanye West pushed back publicly. In Kardashian’s world, even a sentence about school pickups can become a co-parenting subplot.

Co-parenting with Kanye is apparently at its most functional around North

Kardashian did not comment on her current relationship with West, her ex-husband and the father of all four children. The pair were married from 2014 until their divorce was finalized in 2022, and their co-parenting dynamic has played out under the glare of social media, public disputes and competing accounts of family life.

What she did offer was a glimpse of where communication is working: North’s career. Kardashian said she and West have “better communication” when it comes to their daughter’s projects, particularly as North begins pursuing music on her own. “We make sure we’re aligned and that she’s in projects that we both approve,” she said.

That sentence is doing more work than it appears to. Kardashian and West may disagree loudly in public, but their daughter’s ambitions have created a narrow lane where both parents are apparently trying to stay coordinated. North, who is 13, is already moving toward the kind of spotlight both of her parents know intimately. Kardashian has previously said she worries about holding her back from certain opportunities, which makes this parental alignment feel less like a celebrity-management detail and more like an attempt to keep a child’s fame from outrunning her childhood.

There is also an unavoidable layer of family-business irony here. North is not entering an anonymous industry; she is stepping into the combined gravitational field of reality television, fashion, music and one of the internet’s most scrutinized families. Her father is Ye, a major recording artist whose public life has repeatedly collided with the Kardashian machine. Her mother is Kardashian, who turned domestic visibility into a business empire. The two of them agreeing on what North can do may be one of the few areas where the co-parenting conversation has a clear shared objective.

Kim’s exhausted-mom era now has a production schedule

The nanny revelation arrives as Kardashian’s professional plate is already bordering on parody. She has been building Skims since launching the shapewear company in 2019, starring on reality television since 2007 and studying law through California’s Law Office Study Program, which required 18 hours of work per week. She is still working toward the bar exam after several failed attempts, although Page Six reported in May that she was taking a break from studying to focus on filming and production.

She has also expanded into scripted acting, playing Allura Grant in Ryan Murphy’s All’s Fair and recently wrapping Season 2, according to the report. Then there is Hamilton, the Formula 1 driver she is dating, adding a fresh romantic storyline to a life that already has enough plotlines to fill a streaming slate.

Against all that, the five nannies are less a punchline than a glimpse at the machinery required to sustain the Kardashian schedule. The real surprise is that she is still trying to claim the unglamorous bits: the school traffic, the bedtime books, the child in the bed, the family dinner that presumably happens whether or not a camera crew is nearby.

Of course, the internet is likely to remain divided between “five nannies is excessive” and “please understand that childcare is still childcare.” Both reactions miss the more interesting point. Kardashian is not presenting motherhood as a perfectly balanced lifestyle. She is presenting it as a constant negotiation between delegation and presence, money and guilt, public help and private responsibility.

Five nannies can keep the calendar from collapsing. They cannot stop a teenager from growing up in public, settle every co-parenting dispute or make a mother immune to the feeling that she is missing something. Kardashian’s latest confession is compelling because it does not erase the privilege. It puts the privilege directly next to the exhaustion and asks us to look at both.

DON'T GO ANYWHEREUP NEXT ↓
SOCIALOCT 5, 2026

Taylor Swift’s Chiefs Game-Day Wardrobe Has Become Its Own Love Language

From a red lip and distressed denim to a custom jersey-number puffer, Swift’s football fits turned the suite into a very expensive episode of relationship television.

Taylor Swift does not simply attend a Kansas City Chiefs game. She arrives with a plot, a color story and at least one accessory that knows exactly whose name is on the jersey.

That is the particular magic of Swift’s game-day wardrobe: it manages to be celebrity dressing, girlfriend dressing, stadium dressing and highly legible pop mythology all at once. According to E! News’ latest look back at her Chiefs appearances, the singer’s football fits have moved from casual first-date energy to full-scale visual world-building. There are red lips, tiny shorts, designer corsets, team jackets, custom coats and enough carefully placed crimson to make Arrowhead Stadium look like a Swiftie convention with a scoreboard.

The clothes are not incidental. They are the message, delivered in denim, leather, cashmere and the occasional piece of merchandise with Travis Kelce’s number hiding in plain sight.

It started with “I just came to watch my guy”

Swift’s first appearance at Arrowhead Stadium in September 2023 was comparatively low-key by Swiftian standards: a white DÔEN tank, distressed Ksubi denim shorts, a Chiefs windbreaker and New Balance sneakers. It was relaxed enough to suggest spontaneity, but polished enough to make clear that “I threw this on” was not the assignment.

Then came the New Jersey game against the Jets, where Area denim shorts reportedly sold out after Swift wore them with Christian Louboutin boots and a loose leather shirt from Gant. This was the first crucial lesson of the Swift football era: a stadium outfit could behave like a music-video costume and a retail alert at the same time. The venue was MetLife, the guest list included Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, and Swift’s red lip did what red lips do best—made the whole thing feel instantly iconic.

By October, the wardrobe had acquired connective tissue. She wore a Chiefs jacket from WEAR by Erin Andrews, the sports reporter’s line, after Andrews had been publicly associated with helping connect Swift and Kelce. It was a small fashion choice with a giant subtext: the outfit could nod to the romance without ever having to explain it.

That is Swift’s particular talent. She lets a garment carry the wink.

Then the suite became a runway

As the relationship became more public, the looks got more deliberate—and much more fun. A Balenciaga corset appeared under the Chiefs jacket. An Erimish bracelet echoed Kelce’s jersey number. A long red fleece coat and signature lipstick turned a December game into a monochrome fantasy. On Christmas Day, she added a Santa hat bearing his number, because apparently even holiday dressing needed a little tight-end branding.

There is a difference between dressing in team colors and dressing inside a narrative. Swift’s game-day clothes increasingly belonged to the second category. A cream varsity jacket carried the team logo and a “Tay-Tay” patch. A custom puffer by Kristin Juszczyk, wife of San Francisco 49ers fullback Kyle Juszczyk, incorporated Kelce’s number. When Swift wore a cashmere Guest in Residence sweater from friend Gigi Hadid’s brand while celebrating with Kelce after the AFC Championship win, the look landed somewhere between luxury loungewear and soft-launch propaganda.

None of this reads as accidental, even when the pieces are casual. The styling keeps balancing access and distance: she is close enough to be in the family suite, but still dressed like the most famous person in the building. She can stand beside Kelce in a cozy sweater, then appear at the Super Bowl in a Dion Lee crochet corset, Area crystal-slit jeans and a black-and-white palette that makes “supportive partner” look suspiciously like “headlining act.”

The result is a visual language of public affection without the need for a caption. A bracelet does the flirting. A number does the tagging. A coat does the announcing.

Swift’s real trick is making fandom look expensive

By the 2024 and 2025 seasons, the game-day wardrobe had become more fashion-editorial. There was a Versace denim corset with GRLFRND shorts and thigh-high red latex boots. There was an oversized tee worn as a dress with thigh-high boots. Vivienne Westwood plaid arrived with knee-high platforms, followed by a red-and-black Versace tweed blazer and skirt paired with a Victoria’s Secret silk corset top.

These looks did not try to disguise the fact that football had become a new stage. They embraced it. Swift was not dressing like a lifelong sports dad in a polo shirt; she was dressing like Taylor Swift at a football game, which is its own emerging category of American celebrity costume.

Even the more communal moments had styling intelligence. E! notes Swift walking into Arrowhead with Kelce’s mother, Donna, and her father, Scott, in a Louis Vuitton cashmere zip-up. Another appearance paired a Charlotte Simone coat with a vintage Chanel hat. For the AFC divisional playoff game, she returned after more than two weeks away in head-to-toe Chanel with Canada Goose gloves. The outfit said winter weather, yes, but also: absence makes the wardrobe grow more dramatic.

And when the Chiefs lost the Super Bowl, the clothes did not retreat. Swift arrived in bedazzled denim shorts and a $1,300 Alaïa ribbed bodysuit. The team could have a bad night; the outfit was not going to take the blame.

That may be why the looks continue to fascinate. They are not just examples of celebrity styling, and they are not merely evidence of Swift’s ability to sell out a pair of shorts. They are a running record of how a highly scrutinized romance can be made playful, public and visually coherent. The outfits turn the stadium into a shared language: red for the Chiefs, a number for Kelce, a designer label for the Swift machine, and just enough wink to keep the whole thing from feeling like corporate dress-up.

For her first NFL game after marrying Kelce, E! places Swift in another red-and-cream gingham Guest in Residence dress. It is a neat evolution from the windbreaker-and-sneakers beginning: still team-minded, still approachable, but now unmistakably hers.

Swift’s football wardrobe has never really been about blending in with the crowd. It is about making the crowd part of the look. And if the game happens to come with a touchdown celebration, a famous suite and a husband whose jersey number keeps turning up in the accessories? Even better. That is not an outfit repeating. That is a franchise.

RELATIONSHIPSOCT 5, 2026

Brooklyn and Nicola Kiss in Paris as the Beckhams Rally Around Victoria’s Fashion Show

One couple, two Paris itineraries, and a family drama that has somehow turned Fashion Week into a very expensive group chat.

Paris Fashion Week has many traditions: impossible shoes, tiny sunglasses, a celebrity sighting every six feet and at least one family drama unfolding in couture lighting. This week, the Beckham saga supplied all four.

On Friday, Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz were photographed kissing and strolling through Paris, looking happy and very much like a couple on their own romantic itinerary. Across town, or at least in a very different corner of the Beckham family universe, Victoria Beckham presented her spring/summer 2027 collection with David Beckham, Harper, Cruz, Romeo and the younger men’s girlfriends gathered around her.

The visual contrast was almost aggressively tidy: Brooklyn and Nicola in their loved-up lane; the rest of the family assembled for Victoria’s major fashion night. In a family already communicating through carefully observed appearances, the timing did not exactly whisper.

Paris, but make it two separate worlds

Brooklyn’s absence from his mother’s show comes after months of public estrangement from his parents and siblings. He and Nicola were not photographed at Victoria’s presentation, while David shared images from the event and praised his wife publicly.

“We are so proud of you, yet again you show your elegance, passion & beauty in how you want people to feel in your clothes,” David wrote, adding that the family felt “so lucky to be part of your beautiful night.” He finished with a very Beckham flourish: French and patriotic heart emojis, plus a declaration that they “couldn’t be prouder.”

It was a warm, polished family tableau — the kind of image that would once have been filed under celebrity domestic bliss. Instead, it landed against the backdrop of Brooklyn’s continued absence, making the group photo feel less like a casual backstage snap and more like a public statement of togetherness.

Meanwhile, Brooklyn and Nicola offered their own statement without saying anything at all: a kiss on the Paris streets, a stroll, and the familiar visual language of a couple closing ranks. They have been posting affectionate images throughout the year, including photos Brooklyn shared in August of the pair cuddling in bed.

The feud is no longer hiding in the margins

The tension became impossible to treat as mere family awkwardness earlier this year, when Brooklyn posted a lengthy statement saying he did not want to reconcile with his family. He wrote that he was “not being controlled” and was standing up for himself, while accusing his parents of controlling the family narrative in the press.

He also claimed that his parents interfered in his relationship with Nicola and tried to damage their marriage. In the same post, Brooklyn alleged that Victoria behaved inappropriately toward him at his wedding and that his parents pressured him over rights to his name before the couple’s Florida nuptials. Those are Brooklyn’s allegations; neither David nor Victoria has publicly addressed every claim individually.

Victoria later spoke about the situation in an interview with the Wall Street Journal, without naming Brooklyn. “We’ve always tried to be the best parents that we can be,” she said, adding that she and David had spent more than 30 years in the public eye trying to protect and love their children. It was a classic Beckham response: measured, affectionate and notably short on details.

That restraint has left the family’s public appearances doing a lot of the talking. Who is in the photo. Who is not. Who is standing beside whom. Which couple is together at the same event. Which couple is photographed elsewhere, looking blissful enough to make the separation feel intentional even when nobody says that it is.

The Saint-Tropez near-miss made this feel familiar

This is not the first time the family has appeared to orbit the same French holiday without quite occupying the same space. In August, Brooklyn and Nicola were vacationing near his parents in Saint-Tropez while spending time on Brooklyn’s godfather Elton John’s yacht. The couple went ashore for ice cream, while David and Victoria were photographed dining at a restaurant only minutes from the spot.

That episode had all the ingredients of a glossy European farce: yachts, gelato, famous parents, famous in-laws and the possibility of an accidental encounter at the exact wrong restaurant. Nobody needed to announce a confrontation. The geography did the work.

Now Paris has offered a sequel, only with a fashion-show finale. Victoria had one of the most visible nights on the fashion calendar. David made sure the occasion was celebrated online. The younger siblings and their partners appeared alongside the brand founder. Brooklyn and Nicola, meanwhile, were photographed in the city sharing a kiss.

Fans think the timing is meaningful, and the internet is naturally treating the split-screen as a new chapter in the Beckham family drama. But the most compelling part is not whether the kiss was staged as a message or simply a kiss between two married people in Paris. It is that, in this family, private decisions have become public choreography.

A kiss, a runway and the politics of being seen

Brooklyn and Nicola have never been shy about looking united. Their relationship has survived wedding speculation, post-wedding scrutiny and years of headlines about friction with the Beckham family. Their public displays of affection now carry an extra layer because the couple’s partnership is positioned against the family Brooklyn says he no longer wants to reconcile with.

That makes every romantic image feel slightly more loaded than a standard celebrity PDA. The kiss says they are together. The location says Paris. The night says Victoria’s show. The lack of an appearance at the presentation says, at minimum, that Brooklyn and Nicola were not participating in the family’s most visible gathering of the evening.

On the other side, David’s post presented Victoria surrounded by the people who did attend, with the kind of supportive caption designed to leave no doubt about the family’s pride in her. It was not a direct response to Brooklyn. It did not need to be. Celebrity families rarely need to name the missing person when the photograph is already doing the arithmetic.

And so the Beckhams continue their strange new tradition: communicating through proximity, absence, affectionate captions and suspiciously well-timed public moments. Victoria gets the runway. David gets the family portrait. Brooklyn and Nicola get the Paris kiss. Everyone gets photographed.

In another family, this might be a scheduling conflict. In the Beckham cinematic universe, it is a full Fashion Week subplot — one with excellent lighting, a romantic French backdrop and absolutely no sign that the group chat is calming down.